Counterparties for Healthy Ageing Strategy Recommendation
TOTAL SCORE: 7
Score
A1 (Feasibility increased by continuance of pandemic): 0
A2 (Necessity increased by covid pandemic): +1
A3 (political viability): +1
B1 (Relevance to the specific goal of increasing HALE by 5 years by 2035): +1
B2 (Relevance to general goal of biomedical healthy life extension): +1
C1 (Market readiness applicability): 0
C2 (Project readiness): 0
C3 (Move to market readiness): 0
D1 (Actionability): +1
D2 (Degree of measurability): 0
D3 (Degree of leveraging cross-sector inputs): +1
D4 (Awareness of international context): 0
D5 (Resourcefulness): +1
D6 (Reorganisation): 0
E (Disruptiveness): 0
F (Dividends - does the recommendation aid in social activity and inclusivity?): 0
RECOMMENDATION SUMMARY
1. We propose that the UK Government initiate the development of a comprehensive database of partners and relevant counterparties who can potentially serve as partners for the execution of the UK Healthy Ageing Industrial Strategy Challenge Fund.
2. This database should be structured according to the specific roles that each different type of partner would eventually assume, according to exactly how they would be useful and relevant for the strategy’s execution in practice.
3. The creation of this database should be heavily prioritized as an urgent item, given that it is the first step toward choosing and engaging with the entities that will assist in the actual execution of the strategy.
We propose that the UK Government urgently dedicate resources to the construction of a database of potentially relevant partners for cooperation both on the formulation of the national healthy ageing industrial strategy, as well as for the practical implementation of the strategy over time. The first step in this process is the formulation of a large database of potentially relevant partners and counterparties including government ministries, departments and agencies, laboratories, BioTech hubs and other R&D hubs, AgeTech hubs, and relevant start-ups, corporations, NGOs and non-profits. An early and proactive approach to the creation of this database is essential to the formulation of a maximally relevant and effective list of partners and institutional collaborators, and this process should be launched as early as possible to achieve the best possible effects in practice.
Score
A1 (Feasibility increased by continuance of pandemic): 0
A2 (Necessity increased by covid pandemic): +1
A3 (political viability): +1
B1 (Relevance to the specific goal of increasing HALE by 5 years by 2035): +1
B2 (Relevance to general goal of biomedical healthy life extension): +1
C1 (Market readiness applicability): 0
C2 (Project readiness): 0
C3 (Move to market readiness): 0
D1 (Actionability): +1
D2 (Degree of measurability): 0
D3 (Degree of leveraging cross-sector inputs): +1
D4 (Awareness of international context): 0
D5 (Resourcefulness): +1
D6 (Reorganisation): 0
E (Disruptiveness): 0
F (Dividends - does the recommendation aid in social activity and inclusivity?): 0
RECOMMENDATION SUMMARY
1. We propose that the UK Government initiate the development of a comprehensive database of partners and relevant counterparties who can potentially serve as partners for the execution of the UK Healthy Ageing Industrial Strategy Challenge Fund.
2. This database should be structured according to the specific roles that each different type of partner would eventually assume, according to exactly how they would be useful and relevant for the strategy’s execution in practice.
3. The creation of this database should be heavily prioritized as an urgent item, given that it is the first step toward choosing and engaging with the entities that will assist in the actual execution of the strategy.
We propose that the UK Government urgently dedicate resources to the construction of a database of potentially relevant partners for cooperation both on the formulation of the national healthy ageing industrial strategy, as well as for the practical implementation of the strategy over time. The first step in this process is the formulation of a large database of potentially relevant partners and counterparties including government ministries, departments and agencies, laboratories, BioTech hubs and other R&D hubs, AgeTech hubs, and relevant start-ups, corporations, NGOs and non-profits. An early and proactive approach to the creation of this database is essential to the formulation of a maximally relevant and effective list of partners and institutional collaborators, and this process should be launched as early as possible to achieve the best possible effects in practice.