National Longevity Development Plan Recommendation
TOTAL SCORE: 10
Score
A1 (Feasibility increased by continuance of pandemic): +1
A2 (Necessity increased by covid pandemic): 0
A3 (political viability): 0
B1 (Relevance to the specific goal of increasing HALE by 5 years by 2035): 0
B2 (Relevance to general goal of biomedical healthy life extension): +1
C1 (Market readiness applicability): 0
C2 (Project readiness): 0
C3 (Move to market readiness): 0
D1 (Actionability): +1
D2 (Degree of measurability): 0
D3 (Degree of leveraging cross-sector inputs): +1
D4 (Awareness of international context): +1
D5 (Resourcefulness): +1
D6 (Reorganisation): +1
E (Disruptiveness): +2
F (Dividends - does the recommendation aid in social activity and inclusivity?): +1
Point of comparison: The Committee's document represents a point of view that recognises the need for a degree of coordination as far as is necessary to improve accountability and general coordination for “coping” with aging, but not the cross-sector coordination required to reach a future where Health Longevity can be categorised as an asset class in itself.
RECOMMENDATION SUMMARY
Aging Analytics Agency’s position is that solving the Aging Society Grand Challenge requires a breadth of coordination typical of an entire industrial strategy unto itself, rather than just a single pillar of one. The name we give to such a propositional strategy is "National Longevity Development Plan", which would consist of national and international initiatives. Aging Analytics Agency has spent time documenting the various elements of nascent “National Longevity Development Plan’s” across various countries, and their impacts on metrics such as HALE.
Score
A1 (Feasibility increased by continuance of pandemic): +1
A2 (Necessity increased by covid pandemic): 0
A3 (political viability): 0
B1 (Relevance to the specific goal of increasing HALE by 5 years by 2035): 0
B2 (Relevance to general goal of biomedical healthy life extension): +1
C1 (Market readiness applicability): 0
C2 (Project readiness): 0
C3 (Move to market readiness): 0
D1 (Actionability): +1
D2 (Degree of measurability): 0
D3 (Degree of leveraging cross-sector inputs): +1
D4 (Awareness of international context): +1
D5 (Resourcefulness): +1
D6 (Reorganisation): +1
E (Disruptiveness): +2
F (Dividends - does the recommendation aid in social activity and inclusivity?): +1
Point of comparison: The Committee's document represents a point of view that recognises the need for a degree of coordination as far as is necessary to improve accountability and general coordination for “coping” with aging, but not the cross-sector coordination required to reach a future where Health Longevity can be categorised as an asset class in itself.
RECOMMENDATION SUMMARY
Aging Analytics Agency’s position is that solving the Aging Society Grand Challenge requires a breadth of coordination typical of an entire industrial strategy unto itself, rather than just a single pillar of one. The name we give to such a propositional strategy is "National Longevity Development Plan", which would consist of national and international initiatives. Aging Analytics Agency has spent time documenting the various elements of nascent “National Longevity Development Plan’s” across various countries, and their impacts on metrics such as HALE.